FMCG

FMCG

High-volume FMCG sites where reactive maintenance interrupts production runs and PM workload competes with output targets.

  • High PM workload across high-speed lines
  • Reactive culture driven by output pressure
  • Audit exposure across BRC, IFS, customer audits
Food and drink manufacturing

Food and drink manufacturing

Sites running mixed batch and continuous lines with hygiene, allergen, and audit constraints layered on top of asset reliability.

  • Hygiene and allergen-driven PM overhead
  • Audit readiness expected at all times
  • Stretched engineering teams covering shifts
Light industrial

Light industrial

Component, assembly, fabrication and contract-manufacture sites with fragmented CMMS data and inconsistent PM standards across cells.

  • Inconsistent PM standards between cells
  • Legacy CMMS data with broken hierarchies
  • No dedicated reliability resource
Process plants

Process plants

Continuous-process sites where unplanned downtime is expensive and PM logic has accumulated over years of small changes.

  • High consequence of unplanned downtime
  • Critical assets without explicit PM coverage
  • Reliability work limited by production windows
Packaging and production sites

Packaging and production sites

Packaging halls and end-of-line areas where maintenance pressure is concentrated on a few high-failure assets.

  • Failures concentrated on a small asset count
  • Reactive work crowding out PM execution
  • Limited PM logic on high-failure assets
Multi-site manufacturing groups

Multi-site manufacturing groups

Groups running multiple plants on different CMMS instances or PM standards, where group engineering wants a defensible common baseline.

  • Different CMMS instances or PM standards per site
  • Group-level reporting that does not reconcile
  • No common reliability framework across sites
Site profile

Where we add the most value.

Asset count
50 – 500
Critical assets per site. Below that and a programme is overkill; above that and it becomes a multi-phase engagement.
CMMS state
Live but bloated
A CMMS is in place, but PM documentation is inconsistent, duplicated, or disconnected from failure data.
Reliability resource
Often none
Sites without a dedicated reliability engineer, where the maintenance manager is also the de facto reliability lead.

Recognise your site here?

The fastest way to know whether a MaintainIQ programme would help is a focused CMMS Diagnostic.

Book a CMMS Diagnostic